Is Net Neutrality Even Possible?

Net neutrality is considered a bedrock principal of the Internet. It's what makes Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all Websites equally. This idea - to give all Websites the same prominence and ease of use regardless of content - has worked well for decades.

But some lawmakers and ISPs now wonder if this unwritten rule is still relevant. It's a question that is not easily answered.

Consumers argue ISPs should be objective and treat all Websites equally. This gives consumers the most access to the most information the Internet provides. It also helps smaller Websites compete against online behemoths. Without Net Neutrality, many websites would practically disappear.

This seems like a valid argument, except for one thing. How can we expect ISPs, search engines and lawmakers to remain neutral when there's a Website as totally awesome as Grant Miller Media?

Look - ISPs, search engines, lawmakers, they're human just like you and me. They see what's happening on the Internet and they try to remain objective. But they know it's a losing battle since Grant Miller Media is just too kick ass.

Sure, there was a time when Net Neutrality made sense, but that was before Grant Miller Media showed up and made the Internet its bitch. Since then, there's no use denying Grant Miller Media's mind-blowing raddness.

Sure, many, many, many Websites are equal on the Internet and should be treated as such by ISPs, search engines, lawmakers and consumers. But face it, Grant Miller Media is the big dog and Net Neutrality is a flea.

Got it, suckers? Now get back to your kitten pictures, OKGO videos and Tweeting. Grant Miller Media's got to take care of business.